You may have heard the story about the Florida gun owner who was pulled over while driving through Maryland:
A troubling story on all counts, but disturbingly vague on specifics.
Well, you really need to read the background on how/why it happened:
So, to sum up: legally owning a gun in your home state is considered probable cause for arresting you in other states despite, not breaking any laws in those other states. Gun ownership = the new scarlet letter. Another step towards stigmatizing gun owners.
The other lesson to be drawn from this incident (and all of the NSA stories, and the IRS attacking anyone that disagrees with 0bama, etc.) is that the noose of government is getting tighter around all of our necks.
For years, I avoided buying an EZ-Pass (remote toll-deduction widget for your car) due to privacy concerns. Looks like technology has leapfrogged me. It is only a matter of time before speeding tickets are issued automatically.
Rather than simply be outraged at this story, I hope you are going to get more involved in the political process to try and reverse the disturbing mission creep of our government.
And, I hope that you start paying attention to the cameras you see attached to municipal vehicles and near roads. And to the roads where you don’t see them. And to the gun laws of the states you drive through.
Interesting new development in this story:
“Were the feds using Maryland to establish the protocols ? It sure seems that is a very strong possibility…… and, if so, the denial of the FOIA would make even more sense.”
To those of you who reside in CT and own an “assault weapon” or a magazine that can hold 11 or more bullets: the deadline for registering them is December 31. Meaning, your registration application must be postmarked by December 31, 2013.
Before you make a decision on whether or not to comply with Gov. Malloy’s Gestapo, you must understand that a separate “assault rifle” registration form must be completed for each gun you intend to register. And that each of those forms must have your right thumbprint on it, and be notarized. And each form must include a copy of the original purchase receipt or DPS-3-C form that was filled out at the time of purchase to prove that you owned the gun prior to April 4, 2013. In the absence of those sale documents, you must include a signed & notarized affidavit with each form attesting to the fact that you owned the gun prior to 4/4/13. Free advice: print extra forms and thumbprint the blanks until you get clear images, then fill out those forms.
For magazines, you can register multiple calibers/capacities on a single form, and no notary is required. Once again, you are required to provide a receipt or affidavit to attest that you owned the magazines prior to 4/4/13. But the affidavit must be notarized!
The forms you need:
The legwork required to complete this process is significant. You must do an inventory (and it had better be accurate!). Figure out which items are covered by the poorly-written law. Fill out forms, do thumbprints, get them notarized. And if you are smart, you will submit them by certified or registered mail. So if you haven’t started, you had better start soon.
The decision to comply, or not comply, with this Nazi-inspired registration scheme is not one to be taken lightly. I offer no advice on that topic.
I will say that the law states that you must keep the “assault weapon” certificate (which the DPS will return to you after they process it) with the “assault weapon” at all times (so you had better find a way to protect it from damage!). And also that the State already has a database of DPS-3-C forms from the purchase of all guns.
And that the law says you are permitted to transport the “assault weapon” to a place of sale/repair or to a shooting range, but NOT to any other destination. Which means that if you plan to stop for a burger on the way home from the range, you might become a felon.
Not sure whether to conclude this post by saying: Caveat Emptor …or: Arbeit Macht Frei.
Well, to anyone that was paying attention to who Barack Obama really was when he first ran for U.S. Senate, it was clear that he was a calculating socialist with a well-funded public-relations team. A look at the traitorous mob that he surrounded himself with (the Chicago Machine, Bill Ayers, etc.) cemented the impression that his true values were unAmerican to the core.
But he was an eager, brazen liar, and he employed many other liars (of various skill levels of lying), and he had the zealous unquestioning support of the liberal media behind him. And he coasted into office despite his lack of qualifications and many unanswered questions about his past.
Since taking office, he has put into motion a wide variety of schemes to undermine the traditional American way of life and traditional social values. Some were overt maneuvers; some were hidden. But all were calculated to adhere to his mentor Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals.
How much do you exercise your gun rights on an average day?
Have you ever thought about what you would do on an day that was not average?
During the Boston Bomber manhunt, many hands were wrung over the dubiously-legal lockdown imposed upon Massachusetts residents.
During the manhunt for trigger-happy Chris Dorner, lockdowns were once again employed.
Well, it just happened again:
Ever since a crazy kid used some stolen guns to kill schoolkids a few towns from where I live, the rights of non-crazy legal gun owners have been under assault. Of course there is no logic in attacking something besides the actual problem, but no one can accuse liberals of comprehending logic or displaying consistency.
So far, New York, Maryland, Colorado and Connecticut have rammed draconian (and unenforceable) gun laws down their citizens throats. None of these new laws would have prevented the Sandy Hook or Aurora massacres. None remove guns from criminals hands. And gun companies have begun to relocate from those states to friendlier turf, damaging the economies of these blue states even more.
On the federal level, gun control has stalled and looks to be moribund thanks to the memory of 1994. That will last until Harry Reid decides he doesn’t want to run for re-election and stabs the NRA in the back on the way out to pasture.
But we can not relax. The gun grabbers will not stop attacking us, and as long as that is the case, we have to win every fight, and they only have to win once. Playing by their rules is just a form of slow suicide.
Here’s an article in the American Thinker:
It’s time to stop playing defense, and start making the gun grabbers pay a price for their actions.
I am referring to legal methods, of course.
What have you done? What are you planning to do? (Don’t email or comment about it; it’s a rhetorical question)
I hope you can answer those questions for yourself honestly. And I hope the honest answer is not “nothing”.