A story has been circulating in the gun blog world, a podcast interview with a crime victim as well as the original AR15.com thread where he posted his story.
After listening & reading, I (like many others) believe that there are lessons to be learned from this man’s unfortunate experience.
What those lessons are may depend heavily on the biases that you bring to the analysis.
This guy has beaten himself up plenty over this incident, and I am not trying to pile on. But he made some major errors that are entirely correctable.
Wow, the guys at Ruger are really burning the midnight oil.
Now they have an 8-shot .22LR version of the LCR polymer-framed revolver.
They released an 8-shot .22 SP101 with a 4″ barrel and a 10-shot version of the Single-Six (with a 5.5″ barrel) a few months back.
Now they have adapted the LCR with a 1.875″ barrel to .22LR, with the same heavily-relieved cylinder design.
It is almost impossible to get a gun to legally defend yourself in Chicago.
That fact is a problem for most law-abiding citizens, who are at the mercy of criminals who don’t obey the law (and are not adequately punished when caught).
Unless you are this guy:
Not every gun owner practices as much as they ought to.
I understand why: our lives are full and guns don’t nag as loudly as spouses do; dragging our gear to the nearest range (which might not be so near) is a hassle; range-time and ammo cost money; and cleaning guns can be a chore.
But we all need to practice, and I am glad to see people taking the time and bearing the expense to do it.
Except when they aren’t “practicing” to get better, and they’re just wasting ammo & making noise.
There is a time and a place to do that and it is fun. I have done it, so have most shooters. It’s cathartic, it’s more fun than manually unloading a magazine. But you don’t become a better shooter by setting the bar absurdly low and then failing to meet even that low standard.
Golly, there’s a lot of finger-pointing and animosity flying around whenever you start to talk about shooting classes and the people who teach them. Ask a simple question about the qualifications behind someone’s reputation, and all of a sudden you have people calling you names and making accusations. Are Jeff Cooper and Barack Obama related?
What are the qualifications of a shooting instructor? There’s actually 2 relevant questions there: what are the actual qualifications of the instructors? And: what should the qualifications be for an instructor? Does anyone think that those 2 questions are not legitimate questions to consider? Ideally, that Venn diagram would have 100% overlap, but the world is not a perfect place.
Most of us have seen the youtube videos of “shooting instructors” doing questionable and dangerous things. What sane person would take a class with the guy who advocates running at his assailant while shooting? “Shoot you to the ground” I think he called it. Stupid is what those of us who watched the video call it.
(click the title for more)